Study co-authors Andrew Rouse, Peter Cook, and Carson Hood with Ronan. (Credit: Photo by Colleen Reichmuth; NMFS 23554)
In a nutshell
- A sea lion named Ronan matched or outperformed humans in a rhythm test, showing better consistency and synchronization to beats than all ten human participants tested, and even beating 98% of simulated human trials.
- This challenges the long-held belief that rhythm is uniquely human, suggesting that with the right training, non-human animals may have similar beat-keeping abilities.
- Ronan’s skills improved dramatically over time, despite having far less rhythmic exposure than humans, highlighting the powerful role of experience and learning in developing rhythmic ability, even across species.
SANTA CRUZ, Calif. — Meet Ronan, the sea lion who’s putting human rhythm to shame. This marine mammal has demonstrated beat-keeping abilities that not only match but sometimes surpass those of humans. Our musical abilities may not be as special as we thought.
In a new study published in Scientific Reports, researchers from the University of California, Santa Cruz, have demonstrated that Ronan can synchronize her movements to a beat with greater precision than most humans. This contradicts the long-held belief that rhythmic abilities are uniquely human.
For decades, scientists have debated whether humans possess unique biological mechanisms for keeping beat, that innate ability to perceive and move to steady pulses in complex stimuli like music. While some animals demonstrate synchronization in nature, none had shown the same flexibility and precision as humans in laboratory settings until Ronan came along.
Photo by Colleen Reichmuth; NOAA/NMFS 23554)
Originally trained at age three to bob her head to metronomic sounds, Ronan showed impressive results in initial studies. But critics suggested her performance, while noteworthy, relied on different neurobiological mechanisms than those used by humans.
Now 16, Ronan is considered “grown up and in her prime.” She has continued practicing rhythm intermittently, and researchers wanted to reassess her capabilities compared to humans performing similar movements.
Sea Lion vs. Humans
The study involved Ronan and 10 human participants who were instructed to match arm movements with metronomic sounds at various tempos (112, 120, and 128 beats per minute). Rather than using typical button-pressing tasks often seen in human rhythm studies, researchers designed a test requiring larger body movements similar to Ronan’s head-bobbing.
The researchers found that Ronan’s synchronization abilities exceeded those of the human test subjects across the board, showing greater accuracy and less variability when responding to the same sound stimuli. No human participant outperformed Ronan across all measured metrics of synchronization.
“She’s motivated. To her, it’s a game she knows how to win,” says study author Colleen Reichmuth from UC Santa Cruz. “And she likes the fish that come with it.”
When the researchers compared Ronan’s performance to a statistical model simulating 10,000 human trials, they found she was closer to perfect synchronization than 98% of the simulated human trials.
Rhythm’s Evolutionary Origins
Beyond challenging notions about human uniqueness, the study also complicates our understanding of how rhythm perception evolves. Previous theories suggested that specialized neural adaptations in humans might explain our rhythmic abilities. Yet here was Ronan, a species not known for vocal learning abilities, often thought necessary for beat perception, performing with remarkable precision.
“She definitely wasn’t overtrained,” says lead study author Peter Cook from UC Santa Cruz, in a statement. “Realistically, if you added up the amount of rhythmic exposure Ronan has had since she’s been with us, it is probably dwarfed by what a typical 1-year-old kid has heard.”
Ronan’s rhythmic training history was actually less extensive than what humans typically experience. The researchers point out that comparing typical human rhythmic exposure throughout development with Ronan’s training shows her experience was notably sparse and occurred much later in her development.
Most humans undergo what researchers call a “rhythmic apprenticeship” beginning in early childhood through exposure to music, songs, games, and cultural rhythmic patterns. By contrast, Ronan learned to entrain to beats through about 90 training sessions over six months in adolescence.
Ronan’s performance improved substantially from age three on. Her phase-tempo relationship, previously showing a tendency to lag slightly behind faster tempos and get ahead of slower ones, largely disappeared with experience. At 16, she now synchronizes nearly perfectly across all tempos tested.
If a sea lion can match or exceed human rhythm abilities with relatively minimal training, what does this suggest about other species? And what does it reveal about the foundations of human musical behavior?
“If you’re going to say dogs can’t dance, you have to empirically assess that—really give the dog many opportunities to receive very precise feedback on rhythmic movement and see how they do,” says Cook. “I would be very surprised if you couldn’t get a border collie to do something like what Ronan does if you spend enough time on it.”
The researchers ultimately concluded that when comparing Ronan to humans in equivalent tests, there’s no basis for claiming her beat-keeping abilities are inferior to or fundamentally different from those of typical adult humans.
The beat goes on – but it’s no longer just humans keeping time. Ronan’s remarkable rhythmic abilities suggest that what we’ve long considered uniquely human talents may simply be skills we haven’t properly tested in other species. Perhaps it’s time we face the music: we’re not as special as we thought.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers compared the rhythm synchronization abilities of a 15-year-old female (her age at the time of the study) California sea lion named Ronan with ten human participants. Ronan had previously been trained at age 3 to bob her head to rhythmic sounds. The study used high-speed video (240 fps) to capture movements of both Ronan and humans responding to metronomic sounds at various tempos (80, 96, 108, 120 bpm for comparing Ronan’s performance at different ages, and 112, 120, 128 bpm for comparison with humans). Rather than using button-pressing tasks typical in human studies, researchers had human participants perform arm “chopping” movements similar in amplitude to Ronan’s head-bobbing. Each participant completed 12 test trials with novel snare drum stimuli, and both timing and precision were measured for all movements.
Results
Ronan’s performance at age 15 (her age at the time of the study) showed marked improvement compared to age 3, with more precision and near-perfect phase synchronization across all tempos. When compared to humans, Ronan’s synchronization was more accurate and less variable. Her mean tempo interval was closer to the stimulus rate than many human subjects, her movement interval standard deviation was lower than all humans across all tempos, and her mean phase angle was closer to perfect synchronization than most humans. Further analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 human trials showed Ronan’s phase alignment was closer to perfect than 98% of simulated trials. No single human outperformed Ronan across all metrics of synchronization (tempo matching, phase matching, standard deviation, and vector length).
Limitations
The study acknowledges several limitations. The sample size of human participants was small (10), and they had limited experience with the specific movement task compared to Ronan. While Ronan had more experience with the specific task, humans had greater overall exposure to music and rhythm throughout their lives. Additionally, the study focused on simple isochronous (evenly spaced) stimuli rather than complex rhythmic patterns, so further research is needed to compare human and non-human rhythmic dynamics with more complex stimuli.
Funding and Disclosures
The authors declared no competing interests. Animal research was conducted under the authorization of the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service (marine mammal research permit 23,554) with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California Santa Cruz. Human study protocols were reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at UC Santa Cruz, and participants provided informed consent.
Publication Information
The study “Sensorimotor synchronization to rhythm in an experienced sea lion rivals that of humans” was published in Scientific Reports (2025, Volume 15, Article number 12125) by authors Peter F. Cook, Carson Hood, Andrew Rouse, and Colleen Reichmuth from New College of Florida and the Institute of Marine Sciences at the University of California Santa Cruz.