Smoking cigarette

(Photo creidt: © Alem Bradic | Dreamstime.com

JYVÄSKYLÄ, Finland — Most people know smoking is bad for their health, but a new study suggests it could also be bad for their wealth. Research from Finland reveals that smoking in early adulthood can significantly impact your career trajectory and earning potential, with effects that ripple through decades of working life.

Living in an age where smoking rates have declined significantly since the 1990s, you might wonder why this matters. Despite the downward trend, smoking remains surprisingly prevalent in high-income countries, with 18% of women and 27% of men still lighting up as of 2019. While most smokers are aware of the health risks, they might not realize how their habit could be affecting their professional lives and financial future.

The study, published in Nicotine and Tobacco Research, analyzed data from nearly 2,000 Finnish adults to explore how smoking habits in early adulthood influenced their long-term success in the job market. What they found was striking: for each pack-year of smoking (equivalent to smoking one pack of cigarettes daily for a year), people experienced an average 1.8% decrease in earnings and were employed for 0.5% fewer years over the study period.

“Smoking in early adulthood is closely linked to long-term earnings and employment, with lower-educated individuals experiencing the most severe consequences,” said the paper’s lead author, Jutta Viinikainen, from the University of Jyväskylä, in a statement. “These findings highlight the need for policies that address smoking’s hidden economic costs and promote healthier behaviors.”

Pack of cigarettes
Research shows how “pack-years” have a clear link to a person’s earnings and career mobility. (Credit: © Ian Andreiev | Dreamstime.com)

Research from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study tracked participants’ smoking habits and career trajectories from 2001 to 2019, providing a long-term look at how tobacco use influences professional success over time. The study focused on adults who were between 24 and 39 years old at the start of the study period. Beyond just counting cigarettes, researchers calculated “pack-years” – a measure that considers both how much and how long someone has smoked – to understand the cumulative impact of smoking on career outcomes.

Particularly interesting was how smoking’s impact varied across different demographic groups. Young smokers with lower education levels faced the steepest penalties in terms of reduced earnings, while older smokers in this educational bracket saw the most significant drops in employment years. This pattern suggests that smoking’s effects on career success evolve differently across age groups and education levels.

For younger workers, smoking appeared to create immediate barriers to earning potential, possibly due to reduced productivity or unconscious bias from employers. Meanwhile, older workers faced growing challenges maintaining steady employment as the long-term health effects of smoking began to manifest, particularly in physically demanding jobs that are more common among those with less formal education.

Consider this: reducing smoking by just five pack-years (equivalent to smoking one pack daily for five years) could potentially boost earnings by 9%. That’s a substantial difference in earning power that could compound significantly over a career span, affecting everything from lifestyle choices to retirement savings.

"Quit smoking" on calendar as New Year's resolution
Reducing smoking by five pack-years could lead to a potential earnings increase of 9%, research shows. (Photo by © Ian Andreiev | Dreamstime.com)

Of particular concern is how these effects might create a potential feedback loop of disadvantage. While the study found that those with lower education levels appeared to face greater economic consequences from smoking, it’s important to note that this relationship is complex and influenced by many factors. This suggests that smoking could be amplifying existing socioeconomic disparities, making it harder for people to climb the economic ladder.

Smoking’s impact on physical fitness and performance may explain part of this effect, particularly in jobs requiring manual labor or physical stamina. When you’re constantly short of breath or taking more frequent breaks for cigarettes, it’s harder to maintain the same level of productivity as non-smoking colleagues. Over time, these small differences in daily performance can translate into significant gaps in career advancement and earning potential.

Perhaps most encouraging was the finding that quitting smoking could help mitigate these negative effects, particularly regarding employment stability among less-educated workers. This suggests it’s never too late to improve your career prospects by putting out that last cigarette.

In a world where career success increasingly depends on maintaining peak performance and adaptability, smoking may be more than just a health risk – it could be a career liability that many can’t afford to ignore. As the costs of smoking continue to mount, both in terms of health and wealth, the message becomes clear: your wallet, not just your lungs, might breathe easier if you quit.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers tracked 1,953 Finnish adults from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study, following their careers from 2001 to 2019. They gathered information about smoking habits through surveys and calculated pack-years of smoking for each participant. This data was then linked with official employment and earnings records from Finnish government registries, providing highly accurate information about career outcomes. The study classified participants based on education levels and controlled for various factors like sex, birth cohort, and family background to ensure the results weren’t skewed by these variables.

Results

Each pack-year of smoking was associated with a 1.8% decrease in earnings and a 0.5% reduction in years employed over the study period. The impact was particularly strong among younger workers with lower education levels. When looking at employment stability, the negative effects were most pronounced among older workers with less education. The study also found that people who quit smoking showed better employment outcomes than those who continued to smoke, especially among those with lower education levels.

Limitations

The researchers acknowledge several limitations. The study couldn’t fully account for other unhealthy behaviors that might cluster with smoking. They also note that the number of cigarettes smoked was only measured in 2001, potentially missing changes in smoking habits over time. There might be some recall errors in when people started smoking, affecting the accuracy of pack-year calculations. Additionally, factors like personal time preferences, risk attitudes, and self-control could influence both smoking behavior and earnings, making it difficult to establish direct causation.

Discussion and Takeaways

The findings suggest that smoking’s impact on career success operates through multiple channels, from immediate effects on physical performance to long-term health consequences that affect employability. The stronger impact on less-educated workers points to a concerning interaction between smoking and socioeconomic status. The study also highlights the potential value of smoking cessation programs as tools for career development, not just health improvement.

Funding and Disclosures

The study received extensive funding from multiple Finnish and European institutions, including the Academy of Finland, various university hospitals, and research foundations. The researchers declared no conflicts of interest that might have influenced their findings.

Publication Information

This study was published in Nicotine and Tobacco Research on January 14, 2025, authored by Jutta Viinikainen and colleagues from multiple Finnish research institutions. The research was conducted as part of the ongoing Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study, a major longitudinal research project tracking health and socioeconomic outcomes in Finland.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply