Copy of the Forsa Ring (Credit: Ulrika Eriksson/Svenska Kyrkan)
In a nutshell
- An ancient Viking ring inscription, previously thought to require payment of fines in both oxen AND silver, actually offered people a choice between the two — similar to modern “cash or card” payment options
- The value of an ox during the Viking Age (2 รถre or 50 grams of silver) would be worth about 100,000 Swedish kronor today, showing these were substantial fines that doubled with repeat offenses
- The pricing system reveals stark social hierarchies, while an ox cost 2 รถre of silver, an enslaved person (thrall) cost 12 รถre, and compensation for killing a free person was worth about 5 kilos of silver (equivalent to 10 million kronor today)
STOCKHOLM, Sweden โ Paying a fine in Viking-age Sweden could cost you an ox. Or, if you prefer, it’s equivalent in silver. A new analysis of a thousand-year-old iron ring from Sweden is changing our understanding of how these ancient societies handled their monetary systems.
This ancient ring bears runic inscriptions that are helping researchers from Stockholm University better understand how Vikings handled economic transactions. The study, published in the Scandinavian Economic History Review, analyzes the Forsa Ring, found in Sweden and dating to around 900-950 CE. Researchers have proposed a new interpretation of what may be Scandinavia’s earliest recorded price relationship between silver and livestock.
“The Forsaringen inscription ‘uksa โฆ auk aura tua’ was previously interpreted to mean that fines had to be paid with both an ox and two ore of silver. This would imply that the guilty party had to pay with two different types of goods, which would have been both impractical and time-consuming,” says study author Rodney Edvinsson, professor of economic history at Stockholm University, in a statement.
Making sense of ancient monetary systems requires understanding both language and practical economics. Consider paying a bill today that requires both cash and a specific gift card. If you only had cash, you’d first need to find somewhere selling that exact gift card, creating unnecessary hassle. Vikings faced similar practical challenges, which makes the traditional interpretation of the ring’s requirements questionable.
(Credit: Lars Kennerstedt/the Swedish National Heritage Board)
At the heart of this reinterpretation is the Old Norse word “auk.” While traditionally translated as simply meaning “and,” research suggests it originally carried the meaning of “also” or “alternatively.” This linguistic detail proves crucial. Instead of demanding payment in “ox and silver,” the inscription may have meant “an ox, also (equivalent to) two รถre of silver,” where รถre was a weight measurement for silver equivalent to about 25 grams.
To put these values in modern perspective, an ox worth two รถre (about 50 grams of silver) during the Viking Age would be worth approximately 100,000 Swedish kronor today when compared to the value of an hour’s work. The fines described in the Forsa Ring were substantial, and they doubled with each repeat offense. For context, one รถre could be exchanged for about nine Arabic dirhams, a currency that circulated widely among Vikings.
“As an economic historian, I particularly look for historical data to be economically logical, that is, to fit into other contemporary or historical economic systems,” says Edvinsson. “The valuation of an ox at two ore, or 50 grams of silver, in 10th-century Sweden resembles contemporary valuations in other parts of Europe, indicating a high degree of integration and exchange between different economies.”
The study reveals fascinating details about Viking-age economic hierarchies. While an ox was valued at two รถre, a thrall (enslaved person) typically cost 12 รถre of silver, equivalent to roughly 600,000 Swedish kronor today. The wergild (compensation paid to a murdered person’s family) for a free person was even higher: about 5 kilos of silver or approximately 10 million Swedish kronor. These stark differences in human valuation reflect the harsh social stratification of Viking society.
“The price level during the Viking Age in silver was much lower than in the early 14th century and late 16th century, but approximately at the same level as in the late 15th century and the 12th century, when there was a silver shortage,” notes Edvinsson.
This practical approach to payments wasn’t unique to the Forsa Ring. Later medieval Scandinavian legal codes suggest that payments in either goods or silver were sometimes permitted, indicating that the system documented on the Forsa Ring may have reflected an established economic tradition rather than an isolated case.
What We Know vs. What We Think
Known facts:
- The Forsa Ring dates to around 900-950 CE
- It contains runic inscriptions related to legal fines
- The inscription mentions both oxen and silver รถre
- Similar value relationships appear in contemporary English sources
- One รถre equaled approximately 25 grams of silver
- The fines doubled with each repeat offense
Interpretations and theories:
- The meaning of “auk” as possibly meaning “also” rather than strictly “and”
- The suggestion that payments could be made in either form rather than requiring both
- The ring’s role in documenting standardized exchange rates
While few of us keep oxen as backup currency today, we do maintain multiple ways to pay, from cash to credit cards to payment apps. The Forsa Ring suggests this isn’t just a modern convenience. While we’ve moved from oxen and silver to cards and clicks, the need for flexible payment systems remains as relevant today as it was in Viking times.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers combined several analytical approaches to understand the Forsa Ring’s significance. They examined the etymology of key Old Norse terms and compared contemporary price relationships across medieval Europe. The study incorporated transaction cost analysis – a modern economic theory that examines the hidden costs of making exchanges. Researchers also analyzed later Scandinavian legal codes to understand the broader economic context and converted Viking-age values into modern monetary equivalents for better understanding.
Results
The study revealed a sophisticated economic system where:
- One ox equaled two รถre (approximately 50 grams) of silver
- This valuation aligned with contemporary English sources
- The system allowed flexible payment methods to reduce transaction costs
- Significant price differences existed between various types of property and people
- Viking-age silver prices were lower than in later medieval periods
- The monetary system showed evidence of international integration
Limitations
The study faces several inherent challenges. Working with artifacts over 1,000 years old introduces uncertainty in translation and interpretation. The exact dating remains approximate, and market prices likely differed from legally established values. Additionally, comparing medieval values to modern currency requires many assumptions about relative worth and purchasing power.
Discussion and Takeaways
This research suggests Viking-age economic systems were more sophisticated and internationally integrated than previously thought. The findings indicate practical solutions to complex monetary challenges and reveal details about social hierarchies through economic valuations. The study also demonstrates the value of applying modern economic theory to archaeological findings.
Funding and Disclosures
The paper reports no potential conflicts of interest.
Publication Information
The study was published in the Scandinavian Economic History Review (2024), authored by Rodney Edvinsson from the Department of Economic History and International Relations at Stockholm University, Sweden. The article appears as “Applying a transaction cost perspective to decode viking Scandinavia’s earliest recorded value relation: insights from the forsa ring’s runic inscription.”