American Kestrel

(Photo by Harry Collins Photography on Shutterstock)

In a nutshell

  • Winter is deadly for northern kestrels: Birds overwintering in Pennsylvania had significantly lower survival rates than those in Florida, with males particularly vulnerable.
  • Human landscapes pose serious risks: 70% of adult kestrel deaths were caused by human-related factors like vehicle collisions and building entrapment.
  • Young kestrels are surprisingly resilient: Contrary to previous research, juvenile kestrels showed unexpectedly high survival rates, suggesting conservation efforts should focus on adults.

KEMPTON, Pa. — One of Mother Nature’s tiniest, yet fiercest hunters faces an uncertain future. The American Kestrel, North America’s smallest and most common falcon, has been steadily declining across the continent since the 1970s. Despite years of research, scientists have struggled to identify exactly why these colorful raptors are disappearing.

For the first time, researchers have mapped out survival rates of American Kestrels during different seasons and life stages, following both adults and juveniles across multiple sites from Pennsylvania to Florida.

The research team, led by Dr. Mercy Melo of Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association, tracked 202 kestrels using radio telemetry between December 2020 and December 2022. Melo collaborated on the study with experts from The Smithsonian, and the University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Their paper, published in the Journal of Raptor Research, reveals surprising patterns about when and where these birds face their greatest survival challenges.

The American Kestrels’ Winter Challenge

American Kestrels are familiar birds to many outdoor enthusiasts. Males display striking slate-blue wings with rusty backs, while females show warm, rufous coloration. Both sexes of the falcon can often be spotted hovering over grasslands or perched on roadside wires, scanning for prey. Their distinctive head-bobbing behavior makes them relatively easy to identify.

One of the study’s most important revelations concerns winter survival. Kestrels overwintering in Pennsylvania showed notably lower survival rates compared to those wintering in Florida. This difference might seem small on paper (0.9316 weekly survival in PA versus 0.9881 in FL), but it translates to dramatically different outcomes over an entire winter season. After just 10 weeks, a Pennsylvania kestrel population would be roughly half the size of a Florida population that started with the same number of birds.

This survival difference highlights a fundamental tradeoff in kestrel life history: risk migration to reach more favorable winter conditions, or stay put and face harsher winter challenges as a resident bird.

Three American Kestrel fledglings wearing VHF transmitters and alpha-numeric color bands at the Hawk Mountain site.
Three American Kestrel fledglings wearing VHF transmitters and alpha-numeric color bands at the Hawk Mountain site. (Credit: Mercy Melo)

Males Face Higher Mortality Risks

The study revealed a clear survival gap between male and female kestrels. Males died at higher rates than females throughout the year, but this difference became especially pronounced during the coldest months. To put this in perspective: if you followed 100 female kestrels through a typical winter month, about 96 of the falcons would survive. Follow the same number of males, and only about 90 would make it through that same month.

Over the course of an entire winter, this seemingly small difference compounds dramatically. By the end of the season, a population that started with equal numbers of males and females would have significantly fewer males remaining. Researchers believe this survival gap likely stems from the smaller body size of male kestrels. Being roughly 10-15% smaller than females makes males more vulnerable to cold temperatures and food shortages during harsh winter conditions. Their smaller bodies simply can’t store as much fat for insulation and energy reserves, putting them at a disadvantage when resources become scarce.

Young Kestrels Surprisingly Resilient

The research team made an unexpected discovery about baby kestrels that contradicts what scientists have long believed. Conventional wisdom has held that the first few weeks after leaving the nest are extremely dangerous for young birds of prey, with many not surviving this vulnerable period. However, this study found just the opposite.

When tracking newly fledged kestrels across different study sites, researchers discovered that between 94% and 100% survived each week after leaving the nest. In some locations, not a single juvenile kestrel died during the entire tracking period. Out of 146 young kestrels tracked, only 8 died — a survival rate far higher than previous studies had found.

This surprising resilience of these young falcons suggests that the population decline affecting this species likely stems from challenges faced by adult birds rather than high mortality among youngsters.

A male American Kestrel nestling with its recently attached VHF back-pack style transmitter n the Virginia Piedmont study area
A male American Kestrel nestling with its recently attached VHF back-pack style transmitter n the Virginia Piedmont study area. Feathers cover all but the antenna. (Credit: Joseph Kolowski)

Human Factors Play a Major Role

Kestrels’ adaptation to human landscapes by nesting in building cavities or using artificial nest boxes has made them one of the most visible raptors. Yet their close association with human environments may come at a cost, as shown by the high proportion of human-related mortality documented in this study.

When kestrels did die, the causes varied by age group and season. For adults, most deaths (70%) were attributed to human-related causes such as collisions with vehicles or entrapment in buildings. Natural causes, including predation by other raptors, accounted for the remaining 30%.

The timing of mortality events followed clear patterns. All adult deaths from entrapment in buildings occurred during breeding season, while deaths from other causes happened during the nonbreeding season.

Study authors emphasize that their results “ultimately direct conservation and research efforts toward adults during the nonbreeding season in northeastern North America, which may represent an exceptionally vulnerable stage marked with low survival rates.”

A female American Kestrel nestling with its recently attached VHF back-pack style transmitter in the Virginia Piedmont study area.
A female American Kestrel nestling with its recently attached VHF back-pack style transmitter in the Virginia Piedmont study area. Feathers cover all but the antenna. (Credit: Joseph Kolowski)

Transforming Conservation Approaches

As climate patterns shift and development continues to transform landscapes, understanding how kestrels respond to these challenges throughout their annual cycle becomes increasingly important. Studies like this one provide the scientific foundation for designing effective conservation strategies that address the specific threats kestrels face during different life stages and seasons.

By identifying the nonbreeding season as a particularly vulnerable time for adult kestrels in northeastern North America, conservationists can focus efforts on improving winter habitat conditions and reducing human-related threats during this critical period for the falcons.

“Understanding the factors influencing the American Kestrel population decline will help kestrels but will also improve our understanding of other declining species,” Dr. Melo says in a statement. “We hope [our study] entices researchers to adopt collaborative approaches across geographical regions.”

The researchers acknowledge that much remains to be learned about kestrel survival during the migratory period itself, which couldn’t be captured in this study due to the limitations of VHF transmitter battery life. They suggest that future studies utilizing newer tracking technologies capable of monitoring birds throughout migration would fill this remaining knowledge gap.

For now, the message is clear: saving American Kestrels requires a seasonal approach to conservation that recognizes the unique challenges these birds face throughout the year. By focusing protection efforts on adult kestrels during the nonbreeding season, particularly in northeastern North America, conservation biologists may be able to address one of the most significant factors contributing to the species’ decline.

Paper Summary

Methodology

To track and monitor American Kestrels, researchers employed radio telemetry using two types of transmitters: Holohil BD-2 radio VHF tags and Lotek NTQB2-6-1 NanoTags. They attached these lightweight devices (weighing between 3.2-3.6 grams, less than 3% of a kestrel’s body weight) to the birds using backpack-style harnesses made of Teflon ribbon. Adult kestrels were captured using baited bal-chatri traps along roadsides, while nestlings were taken from nestboxes approximately five days before fledging. Each bird was also banded with an aluminum US Geological Survey band and either a colored alpha-numeric band or a vinyl-coated nylon patagial tag for identification. The researchers followed a standardized protocol for tracking, locating adult kestrels weekly and checking on juveniles three times per week during the first two weeks post-fledging, then twice weekly afterward. They confirmed live encounters through both visual sightings and transmitter signals. When signals didn’t move between re-sighting attempts, researchers searched for fatalities and conducted necropsies on recovered carcasses to determine causes of death. They tracked kestrels at six study sites across four states: three in Pennsylvania (Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Pennsylvania State University-University Park, and Lancaster County), one in New Jersey (Montclair State University), one in Virginia (Virginia Piedmont), and one in Florida (Cape Coral).

Results

The study documented 19 confirmed deaths out of 202 tracked individuals (11 adults and 8 juveniles). Adult kestrel weekly survival varied by sex and season, with males showing consistently lower survival rates than females. During the breeding/summer dispersal season (May through August), female weekly survival was estimated at 0.9911, while male survival was 0.9767. During the nonbreeding season (September through March), survival dropped to 0.9629 for females and 0.9074 for males. When comparing overwintering survival between sites, kestrels in Pennsylvania had significantly lower survival (0.9316 weekly) than those in Florida (0.9881 weekly). For juvenile kestrels, weekly survival rates varied by site but were generally high, ranging from 0.9429 to 1.000 (with some sites experiencing no mortality at all). The global estimate for fledgling survival across all sites was 0.9869 weekly. Causes of death for adults included automobile collisions (4), predation by other raptors (3), entrapment in buildings (2), predation by a domestic cat (1), and undetermined (1). For juveniles, causes included automobile collisions (2), entrapment in a building (1), and undetermined (5). All adult entrapment deaths occurred during breeding season, while all other adult deaths occurred during nonbreeding season.

Limitations

The researchers acknowledge several limitations in their study. Most significantly, individual birds were not tracked for a full annual cycle due to battery limitations of the transmitters (approximately 6 months). This prevented them from monitoring survival during migration periods, which other studies have shown to be particularly dangerous for many raptor species. The study also faced challenges tracking fledglings beyond about four weeks post-fledging, as many individuals made substantial movements out of the tracking area. Some study sites experienced no juvenile mortality at all, preventing the calculation of standard errors for site-specific survival estimates and suggesting that these estimates should be viewed with caution. Additionally, the researchers note that for many recovered fledglings, they could not determine the cause of death, limiting their ability to fully understand the factors driving juvenile mortality. Finally, while the tracking method used provides more accurate survival data than band recovery studies, the researchers acknowledge that their findings are limited to the specific geographic regions studied and may not represent range-wide patterns.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was supported by multiple organizations and grants, including the Robert F. Schumann Foundation, the James A. Kushlan Award, Christina Clayton & Stanley M. Kolber, the Pennsylvania Game Commission and Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Effects Project (Agreement 68-7482-16-550), and the Giorgi Foundation. All capture and banding activities were conducted under proper permits issued to Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Penn State Altoona, Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center National Zoological Park, and Montclair State University. The paper is identified as Hawk Mountain Conservation Science Contribution #404.

Publication Information

The study “Juvenile and Adult Survival Estimates of American Kestrels Throughout the Full Annual Cycle in Eastern North America” was published in the Journal of Raptor Research, Volume 59, Issue 2, pages 1-12, June 2025. The authors include Mercy Melo, Joseph M. Kolowski, Rebecca A. McCabe, John A. Smallwood, Allison Cornell, David King, and Jean-François Therrien, representing multiple research institutions including Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, Montclair State University, Pennsylvania State University-Altoona, and USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply